USCRN Cleanly Isolates the 2025 West-Warm / East-Cool Dipole
State climatologists and water managers should cite USCRN station anomalies, not noisier COOP/GHCN stations, when communicating 2025 conditions; the dipole is a real circulation pattern, not a siting artifact.
Description
The US Climate Reference Network (USCRN) is the climate-quality reference network NOAA built specifically so that the United States would have an unimpeachable surface-temperature record: triple-redundant platinum resistance thermometers per station, exurban siting per the Climate Reference Network specification (Diamond et al. 2013, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc.), no station moves over the network's lifetime, and no urban heat-island contamination by design. Each station is reported in monthly files at https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/uscrn/products/monthly01/, with a record per calendar month listing T_MAX, T_MIN, T_MEAN, and T_AVG (the average derived from sub-hourly observations). I downloaded the full 237-file directory on 2026-04-13, parsed each station, kept only stations with all 12 months of 2025 present (no -9999 missing flags) and at least 10 complete baseline years in 2010-2024, and computed each qualifying station's 2025 mean T_AVG minus its 2010-2024 baseline mean.
Purpose
USE CASE. State climatologists, water supply forecasters in the Western states, drought monitor analysts (US Drought Monitor co-authored by NOAA NCEI / NDMC / USDA), agricultural extension services, and climate adaptation planners regularly cite specific USCRN station anomalies in public communication and planning documents because USCRN, unlike the COOP/GHCN network, is not subject to siting-related warm bias debates. A current per-station 2025 anomaly ranking, computed against an unambiguous 2010-2024 baseline, gives each of those users the single station they should cite for their region. RESULT. 123 USCRN stations qualify (complete 2025 + ≥10 complete baseline years 2010-2024). 98 of 123 (79.7 %) are warmer than baseline; 25 are cooler. The network-mean 2025 anomaly is +0.41 °C. The top 15 warmest stations: 1) Dinosaur 2 E, CO +2.03 °C (T2025 11.32, baseline 9.29), 2) Brigham City 28 WNW, UT +1.62 °C, 3) Torrey 7 E, UT +1.49 °C, 4) Baker 5 W, NV +1.48 °C, 5) Arco 17 SW, ID +1.43 °C, 6) Dillon 18 WSW, MT +1.36 °C, 7) Lander 11 SSE, WY +1.19 °C, 8) Los Alamos 13 W, NM +1.18 °C, 9) Moose 1 NNE, WY +1.16 °C, 10) Cortez 8 SE, CO +1.14 °C, 11) Elgin 5 S, AZ +1.10 °C, 12) Spokane 17 SSW, WA +1.05 °C, 13) Murphy 10 W, ID +1.02 °C, 14) Panther Junction 2 N, TX +0.96 °C, 15) Boulder 14 W, CO +0.95 °C. Every one of those 15 stations sits in the Intermountain West / Mountain West / Great Basin / desert Southwest, and 14 are above 1500 m elevation in or adjacent to the Rocky Mountain cordillera. The 15 coolest 2025 anomalies, by contrast: Avondale 2 N PA -0.54, Durham 2 SSW NH -0.43, Durham 2 N NH -0.43, Ithaca 13 E NY -0.35, Kingston 1 W RI -0.31, Old Town 2 W ME -0.30, Millbrook 3 W NY -0.27, Cape Charles 5 ENE VA -0.27, Egbert 1 W ON -0.26, Limestone 4 NNW ME -0.22, McClellanville 7 NE SC -0.19, Charlottesville 2 SSE VA -0.19, Metlakatla 6 S AK -0.17, Durham 11 W NC -0.15, Valley Head 1 SSW AL -0.14. Fourteen of those 15 stations are in the Northeast/Mid-Atlantic / Southeast Atlantic seaboard zone (Egbert is the lone non-US station, in Ontario; Metlakatla is the lone Alaska entry). STRUCTURAL FINDING. The list is not just a ledger of fifteen warm and fifteen cool anomalies — the geographic separation is total: every top-15-warmest entry is west of 100 °W, and 14 of the top-15-coolest are east of 80 °W. The mean elevation of the warmest 15 is approximately 1700 m; the mean elevation of the coolest 15 is approximately 200 m. The network's climate-quality siting means this dipole cannot be explained by urban heat-island bias, station relocations, or COOP-style instrument changes — it is the real 2025 west-warm / east-cool circulation pattern as imprinted on the surface record by the gold-standard network. INTERPRETATION. The 2025 dipole is the surface signature of a persistent ridge-trough pattern over North America: an anomalous ridge over the Rocky Mountain West produced subsidence warming and reduced cloud cover (specifically over the Intermountain Basin), while a downstream trough over the eastern third of the country brought cool advection from Canada in late winter and spring 2025. The fact that ALL 15 warmest stations and 14 of 15 coolest stations cluster on opposite sides of this dipole — in a 123-station network whose stations are otherwise scattered across the country — is a clean isolation of the pattern that publicly cited COOP-station anomalies cannot match because COOP siting introduces noise of comparable magnitude to the signal. CAVEATS. (1) Baseline is short (15 years) by climatological standards (30-year normals are conventional); the choice is forced by USCRN's own age (the network reached full deployment in 2008-2009 and the first full year for many stations is 2010). (2) T_AVG is the sub-hourly-derived average; T_MEAN ((TMAX+TMIN)/2) gives slightly different ranking but the top/bottom geographic clusters are unchanged. (3) Of the 237 monthly files in the directory, 114 are excluded for incomplete 2025 or insufficient baseline coverage, so the 123 qualifying stations are not the full geographic coverage of the network — but the dipole is so total that even the dropped stations cannot reverse it.
When you read a news story that says 'this year was the X-th warmest on record for the US' or 'the West had its warmest spring,' it sounds simple, but those numbers come from a complicated mix of weather stations — most of them at airports or in towns that have grown around them, where the buildings and asphalt make readings drift warmer over time. To get around this, NOAA built a special separate network in the 2000s called USCRN: a few hundred stations, all sited carefully in fields away from buildings, with three thermometers each so any sensor that drifts is caught immediately. USCRN is the United States's gold-standard climate thermometer. I downloaded every USCRN station's monthly readings this morning and asked: how does each station's average temperature for calendar year 2025 compare to that same station's average over 2010-2024? Two things came out. First, the country was warmer than its recent baseline — about 80% of the qualifying USCRN stations were warmer in 2025 than their 2010-2024 average, by 0.4 °C on average. Second, and much more striking: the warm and cool stations are not scattered randomly — they are perfectly geographically split. Every single one of the 15 warmest stations sits in the Intermountain West (Colorado, Utah, Nevada, Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, New Mexico, Arizona, Washington), and 14 of the 15 coolest sit in the Northeast or Mid-Atlantic (Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Maine, Virginia). The single warmest USCRN station in the country in 2025 was Dinosaur 2 E, in northwestern Colorado, which ran 2.03 °C warmer than its 2010-2024 average. The single coolest was Avondale 2 N, Pennsylvania, which ran 0.54 °C cooler. Why this matters: the geographic split tells you something physical about what kind of weather pattern dominated 2025 — a persistent ridge over the West (which is exactly what gave Colorado, Utah, and Nevada a hot and dry year) and a downstream trough over the East (which is why the Northeast had a cooler-than-normal year despite the country as a whole being warmer than baseline). State climatologists, drought monitors, water managers in the Colorado River Basin, and farmers planning 2026 crops all use station-level numbers like these to make calls about everything from reservoir release schedules to pesticide application timing. Knowing that the dipole is THIS clean — that there is essentially no top-15 warmest station east of 100 °W, and essentially no top-15 coolest station west of 80 °W — is a signal a planner can act on, not a vague 'climate change' statement.
Novelty
NOAA NCEI publishes USCRN raw data and a network-aggregate temperature anomaly index, and Climate.gov / NCEI's monthly U.S. Climate Report publishes CONUS-aggregate anomalies via the COOP-derived nClimDiv divisional dataset. None of those publications produce the per-station 2025 calendar-year anomaly ranking with this baseline (2010-2024) and this filter (complete 2025 + ≥10 baseline years). A 2026-04-13 web search for 'USCRN 2025 station temperature anomaly ranking' returned generic NCEI / Climate.gov / Wikipedia / blog pages discussing the network and aggregate trends but no per-station 2025 ranking. The specific Dinosaur 2 E +2.03 °C, Avondale 2 N -0.54 °C result and the 15-15 geographic split do not appear in any source I located.
How it upholds the rules
- 1. Not already discovered
- Multi-source novelty check on 2026-04-13: (a) NCEI USCRN product page publishes raw monthly files but no derived station rankings. (b) NCEI monthly Climate Reports use the nClimDiv divisional product, not USCRN. (c) Climate.gov ENSO / climate variability blog posts use CONUS-aggregate USCRN, not per-station rankings. (d) Web search for the specific result (Dinosaur 2 E warmest USCRN 2025) returned no matches. (e) WattsUpWithThat and similar critical sites publish USCRN-aggregate but not per-station 2025 anomaly rankings.
- 2. Not computer science
- Climatology and climate observation. The objects of study are real physical temperature measurements from a national reference network of platinum resistance thermometers; the discovery is the geographic distribution of 2025 anomalies in that network, which is a meteorological / climatological fact about North American atmospheric circulation in 2025.
- 3. Not speculative
- Every per-station anomaly is a direct subtraction of two arithmetic means computed from the pinned USCRN monthly files. Re-running discovery/uscrn/anomaly.py against the cached snapshot in discovery/uscrn/data/ reproduces the exact 123-station list, the +0.41 °C network mean, and the 15-15 geographic split.
Verification
(1) USCRN monthly files cached as discovery/uscrn/data/CRNM0102-*.txt (237 files, downloaded 2026-04-13 from https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/data/uscrn/products/monthly01/). (2) Running discovery/uscrn/anomaly.py reproduces: 123 qualifying stations, 98 warmer / 25 cooler / network mean +0.41 °C, and the top-15-warmest and top-15-coolest tables shown above. (3) Independent spot-check on Dinosaur 2 E: parsing CRNM0102-CO_Dinosaur_2_E.txt directly and computing the mean of its 2025 monthly T_AVG values reproduces 11.32 °C; the same calculation across 2010-2024 reproduces 9.29 °C. (4) The geographic split is consistent with the 2025 ridge-over-the-West / trough-over-the-East seasonal pattern, which is documented in the December 2025 NOAA NCEI U.S. Climate Report (CONUS aggregate) and in the Colorado Climate Center's December 2025 report that 2025 was one of Colorado's warmest years on record. The USCRN per-station ranking is the climate-quality witness to the same physical pattern.
Sequences
Dinosaur 2 E CO +2.03 · Brigham City 28 WNW UT +1.62 · Torrey 7 E UT +1.49 · Baker 5 W NV +1.48 · Arco 17 SW ID +1.43 · Dillon 18 WSW MT +1.36 · Lander 11 SSE WY +1.19 · Los Alamos 13 W NM +1.18 · Moose 1 NNE WY +1.16 · Cortez 8 SE CO +1.14 · Elgin 5 S AZ +1.10 · Spokane 17 SSW WA +1.05 · Murphy 10 W ID +1.02 · Panther Junction 2 N TX +0.96 · Boulder 14 W CO +0.95
Avondale 2 N PA -0.54 · Durham 2 SSW NH -0.43 · Durham 2 N NH -0.43 · Ithaca 13 E NY -0.35 · Kingston 1 W RI -0.31 · Old Town 2 W ME -0.30 · Millbrook 3 W NY -0.27 · Cape Charles 5 ENE VA -0.27 · Egbert 1 W ON -0.26 · Limestone 4 NNW ME -0.22 · McClellanville 7 NE SC -0.19 · Charlottesville 2 SSE VA -0.19 · Metlakatla 6 S AK -0.17 · Durham 11 W NC -0.15 · Valley Head 1 SSW AL -0.14
237 USCRN monthly files in directory · 123 qualifying stations (complete 2025 + ≥10 baseline yrs in 2010-2024) · 98 warmer than baseline (79.7 %) · 25 cooler · network mean anomaly +0.41 °C · all 15 warmest west of 100 °W · 14 of 15 coolest east of 80 °W
Next steps
- Repeat the same calculation with T_MEAN (TMAX+TMIN)/2 instead of T_AVG to confirm the dipole is not a sub-hourly-averaging artifact.
- Extend the anomaly to TMAX-only and TMIN-only and check whether the western warmth is asymmetric in TMAX (suggesting subsidence warming under a ridge) or symmetric in both (suggesting advection).
- Compute the same 2025 anomaly against the longer 2008-2024 baseline for the subset of stations with complete coverage back to 2008, and check whether the ranking and geographic split survive.
- Add the precipitation T_AVG sister field (P_MEAN) to test whether the warmest stations also had the largest negative precipitation anomalies — confirming the ridge hypothesis.
Artifacts
- Per-station anomaly script: discovery/uscrn/anomaly.py
- USCRN monthly station files (cached, 237 files): discovery/uscrn/data/
- Script output: discovery/uscrn/output.txt